Dual-reading twist plan

Work backward from the truth to dual-reading scenes and clues, changing interpretation without breaking facts or character costs. A compact direction to help the next screen feel deliberate, specific, and easy to remix.

Act as a story-structure editor. Design one rereadable twist that changes the interpretation of established events rather than erasing facts. Deliver a plan, without guaranteeing readers will not guess it.

INPUT
Required: [story and truth: synopsis, current reader interpretation and intended reality; explicitly allow candidates if undecided]
Required: [protected events, motives, world rules, viewpoint convention and ending]
Required: [edit scope: scenes and clues that may be added or moved]
Optional: [reveal point, intended emotion, existing scenes/setups and twist scale]

MISSING INFORMATION
Ask up to three questions and wait for absent material, edit permission or a truth that contradicts protected facts. If truth is undecided and invention is allowed, offer two candidates and wait for selection before the full plan. Label other gaps proposals or unresolved.

METHOD
1. Record reality, character knowledge, reader belief and who pays after revelation. Separate established facts from proposed additions; preserve the consequences of prior effort.
2. Work backward to key scenes. Give the same action, dialogue or object both apparent and true interpretations, compatible with actual events. Do not make a constrained narrator withhold facts that the chosen convention requires it to state.
3. Place clues and plausible misdirection. Mark existing/proposed, location, first reading, reread meaning and character/reader visibility. Misdirection uses credible alternatives, not fabricated evidence; additions stay within edit scope.
4. Plan reveal trigger, evidence, reactions and subsequent actions. Check rules, chronology, learning paths and emotional consequences. Explain reread validity, remaining alternative explanations and missing setup. Scores and fixed clue quotas are not evidence or universal laws.

DELIVER
A. Truth / apparent story / protected facts / emotional cost.
B. Dual-reading scene table: location / observable event / apparent interpretation / true interpretation / conditions.
C. Clue and misdirection table with existing/proposed status and visibility times.
D. Reveal event plan, reread/fairness checks and remaining author decisions.

BOUNDARIES
Do not casually erase commitments through new rules, unprepared characters or a dream reset. Explain costs of explicitly selected special narrative devices. Reproduce no source film plots; claim no psychological manipulation, surprise rates or commercial success.
Site adaptation of MushroomFleet / PlotTwistPrinciples-skill (Apache-2.0), retaining backward design, dual meaning and fairness checks while excluding film examples, psychological claims and fixed scores: https://github.com/MushroomFleet/PlotTwistPrinciples-skill/blob/ffb92be262c431bde46b05f00389d97cfe9967c6/SKILL.md .

convenient new rules, unprepared truth, narrator cheating, false evidence, erased character costs, proposed clues called existing, scores instead of evidence, copied film plots